due today descriptive deigns

due today descriptive deigns. Evaluate and briefly discuss the three descriptive designs presented in Chapter 3 (case studies, archival research, and observational research). Be sure to discuss the strengths and weaknesses associated with each approach. Which of these three approaches do you think is the best descriptive design and why? Finally, recommend research questions or topics for which each of these designs would be effective in investigating.

Your initial post should be 250 to 300 words. Utilize a minimum of two peer-reviewed sources that were published within the last 10 years and are documented in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

due today descriptive deigns

PSY 550: Final Project Guidelines and Grading Guide

PSY 550: Final Project Guidelines and Grading Guide. PSY 550: Final Project Guidelines and Grading Guide

 

Overview

The final project for this course is the creation of an evaluative, comprehensive literature review.You will select a psychological measure or test. You will evaluate the test using research in peer-reviewed psychology journals to substantiate claims about its validity, reliability, applications, and implications.

 

Prompt

Your literature review should answer the following prompt: What is the overall appropriateness and practical value of your selected psychological assessment measure?

 

Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:

                    I.            Background of the test [ PSY-550-01]

a.       What is the purpose of the test?

b.      What type of test is it? What type of information does it yield?

c.       How is it administered and scored? Who publishes the results?

d.      For whom is this test intended? Who else has utilized this test?

                  II.            Assessment of the test

a.       To what extent does the test employ appropriate psychometric principles? [ PSY-550-03]

b.      To what extent has the reliability and validity of the test been demonstrated for varying populations? [PSY-550-02]

c.       What are the cut scores for “normal” versus “at-risk” and/or “clinically significant”? Is the method for interpreting and communicating the results (e.g., scaled scores, percentile ranks, z-scores, t-scores) appropriate? [ PSY-550-03]

d.      Are there any specific cultural concerns that should be attended to? To what extent do cultural and environmental factors for minorities or special populations impact the effectiveness of the measure? [ PSY-550-04]

e.      To what extent are there ethical issues related to the use, administration, and interpretation of this measure? [ PSY-550-05]

                III.            Practical applications of the test

a.       Under what circumstances would you give this test? Provide example scenarios in which the test would be helpful to another mental health professional, parent, teacher, student, individual, court, business, or other profession? [ PSY-550-04]

b.      For what purposes and with what clients would you not consider it useful? What are the limitations of this test? [ PSY-550-04]

c.       What issues must you attend to carefully in order to present the test results accurately (e.g., not over- or under-interpret their significance) and ethically? [ PSY-550-05]

d.      What strategies would you use to help you or your client make decisions resulting from an assessment (e.g., pairing results with other kinds of information)? [PSY-550-02]

 

 

 

Instructions

 

Final Product:Comprehensive Literature Review

In task 10-2 ,you will submit your final literature review. This should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the main elements of the final product. It should reflect the incorporation of feedback gained throughout the course. You should comprehensively review and integrate (at a minimum) seven scholarly resources, including peer-reviewed research articles and/or well-respected texts. This milestone is graded using the Final Project Rubric (below).

 

With your final Literature Review, you will submit an annotated bibliography (separate from your resource page included in the literature review) that categorizes all resources located in the topic area of interest. You should use at least seven scholarly resources, including peer-reviewed research articles or academic texts, to write this review. An example of an appropriate text would be Psychological Testing by Anne Anastasi and Susana Urbina. This document should include full bibliographic information (title, author, and other reference information), the abstract, and your notes about how the resource informs your understanding of the topic.Use APA format for this document, as with all work submitted in this course.

Final Project Rubric

Requirements of submission : Written components of project must follow these formatting guidelines when applicable: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins, and APA format for all elements. The literature review should be a minimum of eight pages, not including references and a cover page (which are required).

 

Instructor feedback : Students can find their feedback in the grade book as an attachment.

 

This project uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. To view the integrated rubric in Blackboard, navigate to the final submission item, click on the title, and then click the “View Rubric” button. For more information, review these instructions .

Critical Elements

Exemplary

Proficient

Needs Improvement

Not Evident

Value Background

[PSY-550-01] Meets “Proficient” and cites specific, relevant examples to establish a robust context for the literature review

 

(5) The purpose, type, intended populations, and uses of the test are sufficiently analyzed to establish an appropriate context for the literature review

(4.5) The purpose, type, intended populations, or uses of the test are not sufficiently analyzed to establish an appropriate context for the literature review

(3.5) Either the purpose, type, intended populations, or uses of the test are not discussed

 

 

(0)

5 Assessment: Psychometric Principles

[PSY-550-03] Meets “Proficient” and claims are qualified and nuanced in their assessment

 

 

(10) Makes accurate claims about the extent to which the test employs appropriate psychometric principles based on the available evidence

(9) Not all claims about the extent to which the test employs appropriate psychometric principles are accurate given the available evidence

(7) Does not make claims about the extent to which the test employs appropriate psychometric principles

 

(0)

10 Assessment: Reliability and Validity

[PSY-550-02] Meets “Proficient” and qualifies claims specific to different population groups

 

 

(10) Makes accurate claims about the extent to which the test’s reliability and validity have been demonstrated by the research

(9) Not all claims about the reliability and validity of the test are accurate based on the research

 

(7) Does not make claims about the reliability and validity of the test

 

 

(0)

10 Assessment: Results

[PSY-550-03] Meets “Proficient” and substantiates claims with scholarly research

 

 

 

(10) Makes and justifies claims about the appropriateness of the methods for interpreting and communicating the results based on psychometric best practices

(9) Not all claims about the methods for interpreting and communicating the results are justifiable based on psychometric best practices

 

(7) Does not make claims about the methods for interpreting and communicating the results

 

 

 

(0)

10 Assessment: Special Populations

[PSY-550-04] Meets “Proficient” and substantiates claims with scholarly research

 

 

(10) Makes and justifies claims about the impacts of cultural and environmental factors on the effectiveness of the test for special populations

(9) Not all claims about the impacts of cultural and environmental factors are justifiable

 

(7) Does not make claims about the impacts of cultural and environmental factors on the effectiveness of the test

 

(0)

10 Assessment: Ethical Issues

[PSY-550-05] Meets “Proficient” and substantiates claims with scholarly research

 

 

(10) Makes and justifies claims about the ethical issues related to the use, administration, and interpretation of the measure

 

(9) Not all claims about the ethical issues related to the use, administration, and interpretation of the measure are justifiable

(7) Does not make claims about the ethical issues related to the use, administration, and interpretation of the measure

 

(0)

10 Applications: Uses

[PSY-550-04] Meets “Proficient” and proposals represent insightful or creative ways for promoting psychological well-being

(10) Proposes multiple, specific scenarios in which the test would be appropriate for use based on the evidence

(9) Proposed scenarios are limited in number or lack sufficient detail to confirm their appropriateness

(7) Does not propose scenarios in which the test would be appropriate for use

 

(0)

10 Applications: Limitations

[PSY-550-04] Meets “Proficient” and the limitations of the test are nuanced and well qualified

 

(10) Proposes multiple, specific scenarios in which the test would not be appropriate for use based on the evidence

(9) Proposed scenarios are limited in number, lack sufficient detail or are not based on the evidence

(7) Does not propose scenarios in which the test would be appropriate for use

 

(0)

10 Applications: Presentation of Results

[PSY-550-05] Meets “Proficient” and the solutions represent insightful or creative ways for promoting psychological well-being

 

(10) Proposes solutions for accurately and ethically presenting the results of the test based on the research

 

(9) Proposes solutions for accurately and ethically presenting the results of the test that are not based on the research

(7) Does not propose solutions for accurately and ethically presenting the results of the test

 

(0)

10 Applications: Decision Making

[PSY-550-02] Meets “Proficient” and the proposals represent insightful or creative ways for promoting psychological well-being

(10) Proposes appropriate strategies for making informed decisions based on the results of the measurement

(9) Not all proposed strategies for decision making are appropriate

 

(7) Does not propose strategies for making informed decisions based on the results of the measurement

(0)

10

Articulation of Response Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format

(5) Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization

 

 

 

(4.5) Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas

(3.5) Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas

 

(0)

5 Earned Total

Comments:

100%

 

PSY 550: Final Project Guidelines and Grading Guide

Paper – Constructivist and Explicit instruction

Paper – Constructivist and Explicit instruction. Reading Philosophies
*Consider the constructivist and explicit instruction views of teaching reading.

*Develop a chart that compares and contrasts the two views. Include two to three reading activities for each philosophy and two to three assessments that correlate with each philosophy.

*Write a summary essay of 1,000-1,250 words in which you describe both approaches and documents the approach that you prefer.

Provide at least five peer-reviewed articles that can be used in support of your content. Use in-text citations and APA format required

Paper – Constructivist and Explicit instruction

PSY 509, 12 Questions

PSY 509, 12 Questions.  

I have 12 (PSY 509) questions I need help with. Please I need for all twelve answers to be correct. I ask that you do not take this request if you cannot provide 100% accuracy.

 

Please use the book annotated on the first page, unless you already have the tutorial completed.

 

Thank you…

 

PSY 509, 12 Questions

Assignment 1: Final Argument Paper

Assignment 1: Final Argument Paper. Assignment 1: Final Argument Paper

Using the information from the PowerPoint presentation you created in Module 3, write an Argument Paper that takes a position on the issue you selected. (1. Should people under 18 be subjected to legal curfews or restricted driving privileges?)  Be sure to include an explanation of the topic, possible viewpoints on the topic, your selected position on the topic, and appropriate evidence to support both your position and that of your possible opponents. Avoid the errors in reasoning that we have studied during the past five weeks by providing your argument in a logically defensible form.

Directions:Provide a summary introduction that succinctly identifies and explains the chosen issue, including key terms.Identify and explain one argument (pro or con) related to the chosen issue; either summarize an existing argument or construct an original one.Identify and assess the type of evidence offered in support of the argument position. This will include identifying premises and conclusions.Analyze the evidence by explaining how the evidence logically supports or fails to support the argument’s conclusion, and critically evaluate the argument for any reasoning errors, accurately align the argument with the selected topic, and describe the source of the argument.Next, identify and explain one counter argument (pro or con) related to the chosen issue and related to the first argument; either summarize an existing argument or construct an original one.Identify and assess the type of evidence offered in support of the argument position. This will include identifying premises and conclusions.Analyze the evidence by explaining how the evidence logically supports or fails to support the argument’s conclusion, and critically evaluate the argument for any reasoning errors, accurately align the argument with the selected topic, and describe the source of the argument.Critically assess which of the two arguments is superior; defend the judgment by explaining how and why. Explain the value of critical-thinking analysis in reaching this final conclusion.Apply current APA standards for editorial style, expression of ideas, and format of text, citations, and references. Professionally present the position using good grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

Submit your Argument Paper in Microsoft Word document format to the M5: Assignment 1 Dropbox by Saturday, July 26, 2014 .   Assignment 2 Grading Criteria Maximum Points Summary Introduction.16Identified and explained one argument (pro or con) related to the chosen issue.20Type of evidence offered in support of the argument position.20Analysis and explanation of how the evidence supports or fails to support the corresponding conclusion.24Evaluation of the argument.28Identified and explained one counter argument (pro or con) related to the chosen issue and related to the first argument.20Type of evidence offered in support of the counter argument position.20Analysis and explanation of how the counter argument supports or fails to support the corresponding conclusion.24Evaluation of counter argument.28Critically assessed which of the two arguments is superior, explaining how and why. Explain the value of critical thinking analysis in this assessment.36Organization.16Usage and Mechanics.16APA.24Style.8Total: 300

 

Assignment 1: Final Argument Paper

importance of play

importance of play.  

Watch the video, The Importance of Play.  Discuss specific examples of how play benefits a child’s development.  Then, using at least one online resource, describe how much play today’s children are getting or not getting.  Be sure to include a link to your resource.  Lastly, offer one to two specific ideas for incorporating more play into a young child’s day.  Your initial discussion post should be at least 200 words in length.

importance of play

Statistics Project Presentation PSYCH/625

Statistics Project Presentation PSYCH/625. Create a 10- to 15-slide presentation (including detailed presenter notes) discussing your statistics project data analyses.

Include the following in your presentation:

 A description and results of each analysisThe descriptive statisticsThe t test or ANOVAThe bivariate correlationsA conceptual summary of the results stating what they tell you about the data (the data is in the attachment in Excel)

Format your presentation consistent with APA guidelines.

Statistics Project Presentation PSYCH/625